This letter addressed on the annual report on solar physics to be submitted by either C. M. Smith or Walker before the board of scientific advice takes place in early October. Further the letter mentioned on the results regarding to spectra and new series with a title of 'Indian Astronomical Memoirs'.

This letter was about the verification of Lockyer's papers about the sun and Indian conditions.

This letter explained on Observatories Committee recommendation that sunspot spectra should be photographed in the first place and that visual observations were to be secondary in the year 1895 or at any rate before 1901. Since he could not find an original document on the subject, he has requested to provide the copy of the recommendations previous to 1901.

This letter was about replying to C. M. Smith opinion on uselessness of a table in the solar article for the Monthly Weather Review.

This letter informs about sending John Evershed a diapositive of Mr.Woods's photograph of "Halley" of 1910 April 1921.

The letter was a reply to Evershed saying that there will be no difficulty in dealing with the 26 inch originals and requesting to provide necessary information.

The letter discusses on the H and K wave-lengths and discusses the recent results that confirm the earlier results, exactly in the case of H and with a difference of 001 with K.

This letter was a reply to the letter discussing definite periodicity in sunspot activity in the mean period being 11.12 years.

The letter was a critisism by Evershed on the assumption of radial outflow of gases with a velocity increasing with heigh above the photosphere, combined with a constant relativity effect.

The letter contains information stating the return of 4-inch lens to Pocock and retaining of 15-inch lens to verify the Venus results.