This letter was reply to D.O.No.2637 of the 6th instant saying that K.A.Narayana Aiyar acted as observer at Periyakulam were October 7, 1907 to January 31, 1908, new appointment was made to the post on April 7, 1908, Periyakulam Observatory, and he does'nt have a idea of what a "charge list".

This letter is from Charles Michie Smith to M. Brown stating that he cannot see his way to countersign the plans and estimates submitted for some reasons which was briefly mentioned in his letter

This letter was with reference to his Annual Indent for Stores forwarded in the year 1905 and submitting points towards it. The letter also speaks on photographic plates, lower power microscope and spectroheliograph.

This letter was about the two meetings of the committee on which Lockyer brought up the matter.

This letter was reply to the telegram from the Metrorological Reporter saying that the Evershed Spectroscope has been forwarded to the Director General of Stores India Office and the instrument should be returned back to Kodaikanal Observatory as soon as possible to work on the Sun especially for prominence work on Sun.

This letter was about modification of the proposals on the Observatories Committee and enclosed a letter which Turner sent about the action of the committee.

This letter was about the reply on photographic plates for the spectroheliograph.

This letter was about the proposal of Smith that was at "Indian Observatories Committee" and also sanctioned the list of instruments that he proposed.

This letter was about John Eershed arrival in coming months and applying for temporary assistance.

This letter was about the reply on the indent to Walker saying that your reading of the indent was all right except that you did not turn the page.