This letter was a reference to John Evershed letter that discusses regarding the spectral lines

This letter was about the expectations some idea of Evershed's intentions

This letter was about AAS council's decision to elect M. K. Vainu Bappu as a honorary member for his contributions to astronomy.

This letter was requesting C. M. Smith to contribute a page or two on the solar phenomena of the year to get it published in the departmental Annual Summary for the civil year 1903.

This item shows that C. M. Smith has just received from Turner an interesting letter about Lockyer, saying that there would be a counter proposal after the solar conference of September 25th 30th at Oxford. Asking Smith to contribute on solar and magnetic activity for the annual summary for the civil year 1904 as like he did for the previous year.

This letter was a reply to Thomas Royds criticizing a note on MS of bulletin 49.

The letter critisizes on the Royds's MS of bulletin no.48 in seven distiguished points.

The letter was a reply to the letter of the 6th of December 1936 and the reprint sent by John Evershed. He enclosed the letter of A. S. Eddington and replying to it. He explained his point of view on A. S. Eddington objection on his formula for the spectral shift of light.

The letter is from the Director of Kodaikanal and Madras Observatories to the officiating Director General of Observatories regarding permission to create reproductions of photographs for memoirs of Observatory

The letter is from the Director of Kodaikanal and Madras Observatories to the Superintendent of Government Press Madras regarding the Memoirs of Kodaikanal Observatory. It states that Ms of Volume 1, Part 1 of the memoirs of the Kodaikanal Observatory has been sent under a separate cover. Along with it is a part of the Royal Society of Philosophical Transaction for inspection and early return as it is to be used as a model for printing.