This letter was about the two meetings of the committee on which Lockyer brought up the matter.

This letter was about modification of the proposals on the Observatories Committee and enclosed a letter which Turner sent about the action of the committee.

This letter was about the observatories committees and the recommendations. It also spoke on Madras time was based on the longitude given in the nautical almanac.

This letter was reply to Govt. on 6th November 1905. G.T. Waker propose to inform the Observatories Committee to secure spectroheliogram, exchange copies of prominence plates made at the Solar Physics Observatory and also to reply to Professor Schuster saying that making arrangements for organizing spectroheliographic work.

This item shows that C. M. Smith has just received from Turner an interesting letter about Lockyer, saying that there would be a counter proposal after the solar conference of September 25th 30th at Oxford. Asking Smith to contribute on solar and magnetic activity for the annual summary for the civil year 1904 as like he did for the previous year.

This letter was about the application from Schuster on behalf of the Solar Union for copies of photographs that have been put on the Spectroheliograph Committee.

This letter explained on Observatories Committee recommendation that sunspot spectra should be photographed in the first place and that visual observations were to be secondary in the year 1895 or at any rate before 1901. Since he could not find an original document on the subject, he has requested to provide the copy of the recommendations previous to 1901.

This letter was about the views of Walker on the report of the Observatories Committes saying that the relations between Kodaikanal and Kensington and the letter received from Lockyer about sending of spectroheliograms.

This letter was reply to Dr.Bappu inquiry on "Texas Symposium in Relativistic Astrophysics" in detail.

This letter discusses about Bakerian lecture with reference to stationary H and K lines of stars.