Showing 10 results

This item was about the Nobel physicist S Chandrasekhar. It outlines about the Chandrasekhar's daily routine involves a regular schedule of studying, reading, and contemplating problems. He believes that these activities keep him inspired to work and conduct research. His research journey is also outlined, showcasing the evolution of his work over time.

This item was about the work history, life style, and research work of nobel prize winner S chandrashekar. John Tierney covered an inspiring story about S Chandrashekar, who won the Nobel Prize in 1983 for astrophysics. The article highlights that after surviving a series of heart attacks and undergoing open-heart surgery, Chandrashekar continued to work on his study of black holes with great passion and dedication. At the age of 71, when most scientists retire, he worked 12 hours a day to complete his project. Tierney's article emphasizes the simplicity and dedication of Chandrashekar towards his work, despite all the obstacles he faced.

This item was about the discovery that was made by the Nobel physicists S Chandrasekhar and William A. Flower. It outlines the award was presented to Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar and Flower for their distinguished work in astrophysics. The research involved the theoretical studies of the physical processes important to the structure and evolution of the stars by S Chandrashekar and the theoretical and experimental studies of the nuclear reactions of matter in the formation of chemical elements in the universe by William A. Flower. The prize was shared equally between the two of them. The article also mentions that the announcement of the award was made on S Chandrashekar's birthday, which is considered as a birthday gift to him for his Nobel work.

This letter discusses for comments on real justification on Newtonian principles predictions.

The letter was a reply to A. S. Eddington acknowledging his work on redshift and his proposal to incorporate factor of 2 in the process. Further he mentioned about Thomas Royds results from the eclipse spectra.

This letter discusses about Bakerian lecture with reference to stationary H and K lines of stars.

This letter discusses on the predicted formula about the shifts of the solar lines in agreement with the observed values at the red end of the spectrum.

The letter disusses on John Evershed's paper which was written 18 moths ago saying that he gone through the paper and a good deal about the factor 2 and the red-shift. A. S. Eddington said that he now more or less concerned that Einstein's theory is wrong on this point, and the true theoritical red-shift is twice his value as you find. Further he mentioned that the Thomas Royds confused him on the desirable value as the eclipse.

This letter was mentioning Sulaiman's excuse and agreeing with his prediction. Further he mentioned about Sulaiman's earlier papers and his "Chapter III".

This letter was a reference to John Evershed letter that discusses regarding the spectral lines